We have all heard the phrase location, location, location. In the context of gaming in Nevada, grandfathered locations refer to casinos or gaming establishments that have been allowed to continue operations under previous laws or regulations, even after new laws or restrictions were put in place. These locations often enjoy certain privileges that newer establishments do not, such as exemptions from zoning laws, gaming license restrictions, or other regulatory requirements that have since been implemented. As such, grandfathered locations can have a competitive advantage over newer establishments due to their ability to operate under more favorable terms, which can include lower operating costs or fewer regulatory hurdles.
For example, since 1991, the Nevada Gaming Commission may not approve a non-restricted gaming license (that is, a license that allows for the operation of table games and/or more than 15 slot machines) for an establishment in a county whose population is 100,000 or more unless the establishment is a resort hotel. A resort hotel is statutorily defined as having a gaming area, a certain number of rooms (based on the county), at least one bar with a seating capacity of 30 patrons, and having at least one restaurant with seating capacity of more than 60 patrons that is open 24/7.[1] However, a property that held a non-restricted gaming license prior to the above law going into effect, is exempt from the resort hotel requirements provided its grandfathered status is continuously preserved.
There are a few considerations to keep in mind regarding grandfathered gaming locations in Nevada. Most notably, a gaming licensee’s grandfathered status will expire if gaming is not conducted on the premises within a period of 24 consecutive months. As a result of this, many grandfathered locations striving to retain their grandfathered status will establish “temporary casinos” on the premises, where gaming will be conducted for a short interval. This brief period of gaming is subject to strict regulatory requirements and must be approved by the Nevada Gaming Control Board and Nevada Gaming Commission in advance but allows a property to retain its grandfathered status. Preserving such status is critical because once a grandfathered status is removed, it cannot be regained.
With the regulatory benefits associated with a grandfathered location, also comes value. In particular, a property’s grandfathered status can be highly valuable, considering a grandfathered status is tied to the land and can be transferred to new owners.
In addition to the value associated with such properties under state law, grandfathered locations exist in the local city and county context as well, where a property may continue to operate with a grandfathered status despite a change in municipal code or zoning laws. In fact, many of the older casinos are located in areas where gaming would no longer be permitted under current zoning laws. However, because these establishments were already operating before the new code provisions were enacted, they are allowed to continue operations.
These grandfathered rights are an important part of Nevada’s gaming landscape, helping to preserve the heritage of some of the state's most iconic establishments while also reflecting the evolving nature of gaming regulation.
If you have any questions regarding the grandfathered status of a location or the licensing process in Nevada, please contact authors Karl Rutledge at krutledge@lewisroca.com, Glenn Light at glight@lewisroca.com, or Salma Granich at sgranich@lewisroca.com.
[1] Nev. Rev. Stat.§ 463.1605 (2024).
Tags: Gaming- Partner
Glenn provides practical solutions to his clients’ problems, and understands the importance of hard work and diligence to meet their business goals.
Glenn Light is a Partner and Chair of the firm's Gaming Industry Group. He provides counsel on nearly every aspect of commercial gaming ...
- Partner
Karl is known for his dedication and unmatched industry knowledge. His experience helps clients take full advantage of the opportunities in an evolving market.
Karl Rutledge is the former chair of the Commercial Gaming Group and current managing partner of the firm’s Nevada offices. He ...
- Associate
Salma Granich is an associate in the firm's Regulatory and Government Practice Group. Salma’s background includes legal research and writing on commercial and interactive gaming. Salma has experience assisting clients with regulatory matters relating to gaming operations. She has ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- September 2024
- August 2024
- May 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- September 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Howard E. Cole
- Katherine Costella
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Yalda Godusi Arellano
- Salma G. Granich
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- A.J. Martinez
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- Michael D. Plachy
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson, CIPP/US
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The Importance of Retaining a Grandfathered Gaming Location in Nevada
- Welcome our 2024 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- Going Viral: Navigating Promotional Sweepstakes Legality in the Social Media Era
- Arizona Voters Modify Creditors' Remedies with Passage of Proposition 209
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Issues Gaming Technology Approval Guidelines
- Amendments to Nevada Gaming Regulation 5
- Nevada Gaming Control Board Workshop on Public Regulation
- New Wave of Arizona Privacy Litigation Regarding Tracking Pixels
- Legal Issues, Problems, and Unanswered Questions Regarding a State’s Ability and Potential Departure from the Depository Institution Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”)
- New Trademark Scam