
- On September 12, the Arizona Supreme Court declined to take review in ADP, LLC v. Ariz. Dep’t of Revenue, No. CV-23-0036-PR., which lets stand the Arizona Court of Appeals opinion in the same case. 254 Ariz. 417, No. 1 CA-TX 21-0009 (Ariz. Ct. App. Jan. 31, 2023).
- This is significant because the Arizona Department of Revenue now has the court’s blessing to tax software-as-a-service (“SaaS”) transactions as sales or rentals of tangible personal property despite no clear Arizona statutory authority to tax digital goods and services.
ADP involved the taxability of the company’s “eTime” software application, which was leased to Maricopa County. County employees were able to enter their time and other employment data into eTime via the web. Once entered, eTime collected and processed the data. Arizona imposes a transaction privilege tax (i.e., sales tax) on rentals of “tangible personal property.” See A.R.S. § 42-5071. At issue in ADP was whether the eTime software was “tangible personal property,” which under Arizona law includes “personal property that may be seen, weighed, measured, felt or touched or that is in any other manner perceptible to the senses.” A.R.S. § 42-5001(21) (emphasis added).
The Arizona Court of Appeals relied on decades-old case law to support its conclusion that eTime is taxable, analogizing the use of eTime to inserting a coin in a jukebox to play a record and the use of a coin-operated laundry machine, both taxable transactions, to conclude that eTime was subject to the transaction privilege tax as a rental of tangible personal property. The cases on which the Arizona Court of Appeals relied – State v. Jones, 60 Ariz. 412 (1943) (music played by a jukebox is tangible personal property) and State Tax Commission v. Peck, 106 Ariz. 394 (1970) (use of a coin operated washing machine is a rental) – are 80 and 53 years old, respectively.
By declining review, the Arizona Supreme Court lets the Court of Appeals decision stand as law in Arizona. This result arguably gives the Arizona Department of Revenue almost unbounded discretion to determine what is “perceptible to the senses” and therefore subject to tax. ADP offers no clear limiting principle for the interpretation of this phrase. Among 23 states that impose sales tax on SaaS, Arizona is an outlier – it is one of only three states that tax SaaS without any clear statutory authority. See COST, Best and Worst of State Sales Tax System (December 2022), available here.
It would also arguably allow the Department of Revenue leeway to tax formerly nontaxable services merely because those services have been automated. See ADP, LLC v. Arizona Dep't of Revenue, 254 Ariz. 417, ¶ 28 (Ct. App. 2023): “ADP manually processed its customers’ payroll; now, ADP licenses eTime to its customers, and eTime automates the [nontaxable] labor that ADP previously provided … The charging of fees to use eTime software that automates its HR work fundamentally altered ADP’s business, thereby warranting a change in taxation that is not discriminatory.”
Will the Arizona Legislature act to reverse the ADP case?
If you have questions on SaaS tax in the state of Arizona, please contact Pat Derdenger or Karen Lowell.
Tags: Tax- Of Counsel
Karen Lowell is of counsel in Lewis Roca’s Business Transactions and Tax practice groups, advising clients on a variety of business and tax planning matters.
With a proven background in resolving business tax disputes, Karen guides clients on sales, use, and property tax matters ...
- Partner
Pat is the go-to lawyer for state and local tax issues. With his unmatched knowledge and strong communication skills, he ensures his clients get the best outcome for their bottom line.
Clients rely on Pat Derdenger for his deep knowledge of state and local tax issues that vitally impact ...
About This Blog
Lewis Roca is immersed in your industry and invested in your success. We share insights and trends that can affect your business.
Search
Topics
Archives
- October 2023
- September 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- November 2018
- April 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- April 2016
- January 2016
Authors
- Alfredo T. Alonso
- Amy E. Altshuler
- Oliver S. Bajracharya
- Edwin A. Barkel
- Trevor G. Bartel
- Nick Bauman
- G. Warren Bleeker
- Brooks Brennan
- Ogonna M. Brown
- Chad S. Caby
- John Carson
- Rob Charles
- Joshua T. Chu
- Brent R. Cohen
- Howard E. Cole
- Lance T. Collins
- Ross L. Crown
- Thomas J. Daly
- Pat Derdenger
- Thomas J. Dougherty
- Susan M. Freeman
- Jessica L. Fuller
- Salma G. Granich
- John C. Gray, CIPP/US
- Art Hasan
- Frances J. Haynes
- Dietrich C. Hoefner
- Jennifer K. Hostetler
- David A. Jackson
- Andrew Jacobsohn
- Aaron D. Johnson
- Kyle W. Kellar
- Kris J. Kostolansky
- Gregory S. Lampert
- Shaun P. Lee
- Glenn J. Light
- Laura A. Lo Bianco
- Karen Jurichko Lowell
- James M. Lyons
- H. William Mahaffey
- Constantine Marantidis
- Patrick Emerson McCormick, CIPP/US
- Michael J. McCue
- Lindsay L. McKae
- Linda M. Mitchell
- Gary J. Nelson
- William D. Nelson
- Rachel A. Nicholas
- Laura Pasqualone
- David A. Plumley
- Kurt S. Prange
- Katie M. (Derrig) Rios
- Robert F. Roos
- Karl F. Rutledge
- Daniel A. Salgado
- Mary Ellen Simonson
- Susan Strebel Sperber
- Jan A. Steinhour
- Ryan M. Swank
- Dustin R. Szakalski
- Chris A. Underwood
- Jennifer A. Van Kirk
- Hilary D. Wells
- Drew Wilson
- Karen L. Witt
- Meng Zhong
Recent Posts
- The IP of Everything Podcast - Episode 21 - The IP of Similar Sounding Songs - Part 2
- The IP of Everything Podcast - Episode 20 - The IP of Similar Sounding Songs - Part 1
- Welcome our 2023 Michael D. Nosler Scholarship Intern
- SaaS is Taxable in Arizona Despite No Statutory Authority to Tax Digital Services
- The IP of Everything Podcast - Episode 19 - The IP of The
- The IP of Everything Podcast - Episode 18 - The IP of AI
- Escrow Agent Found 100% Liable for Wire Transfer to Cybercriminal/Imposter
- GAO Sustains Protest Where Awardee's Proposal Allegedly Misrepresented Availability of Key Person
- NCUA Approves 72-Hour Breach Notification Rule
- Welcome our 2023 Diversity Legal Writing Interns